Ok, after combing through the logs I did find the timing message

2006-11-13 14:03:06 INFO zen.zenperfsnmp: collected 175 of 176 devices
in 40.09
2006-11-13 14:03:12 ERROR zen.zenperfsnmp: Device odin is reporting
more than once
2006-11-13 14:03:12 WARNING zen.zenperfsnmp: snmp agent down on device
odin
2006-11-13 14:03:26 INFO zen.zenperfsnmp: Unresponsive devices:
[['10.0.220.5', 1, 1655]]
2006-11-13 14:04:15 INFO zen.zenperfsnmp: collected 175 of 176 devices
in 48.59

My question is, should I be getting all those oid error messages?  I am
not getting graphs consistently.

If I can supply any other information, or try anything else out, please
give me a shout.


>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2006 at  2:12 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> If you could check a few things for me:
> 
>     what is your SNMP cycle time (Monitors- >Performance-
>localhost)?
> 
> Make sure that the step and heartbeat agree with this number:
> 
>     $ cd $ZENHOME
>     $ find . - name *.rrd - print0 | xargs - 0 -- max- lines=1
rrdtool dump | 
> egrep 'step|heartbeat'
> 
> The heartbeat should be 3x the step.
> 
> Next, we need to make sure that zenperfsnmp is running through all
it's 
> devices.  Run it with debug output:
> 
>     $ zenperfsnmp run - v 10 -- cycle
> 
> It should stop collecting when it gets to:
> 
>     INFO: collected 303 of 304 devices in 42.15
> 
> If you fail to see this message, or get wild numbers like "2 of 100"

> then you know something is failing.
> 
> This "reporting more than once" might happen if devices are modeled 
> under multiple IP addresses, but that's not supposed to happen.  We
can 
> check for things like that if the stuff above checks out.
> 
> - Eric
> 
> DAVE CUSHING wrote:
>> But what is causing the error of getting more than one report back
from the 
> device?  I have tried re- installing 0.23 from scratch but the
problem still 
> exists.  I have played with zenstep a number of different times, but
I still 
> cannot get the graphing to work without some sort of gaps in it.
>>
>> Can I retrograde to 0.22 with the current schema structure or will
that 
> cause problems?
>>
>>   
>>>>> On 11/6/2006 at 8:57 PM, in message
>>>>>         
>> <304AD09F- 889A- 43D4- 8C50- [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Erik A.
Dahl"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>   
>>> Dave,
>>>
>>> This is most likely the reason for the other errors you are getting
 
>>> (about minimum update times).  The "other" Eric is out for a couple
 
>>> of days maybe he will have more insight...
>>>
>>> - EAD
>>>
>>> On Nov 5, 2006, at 12:13 PM, DAVE CUSHING wrote:
>>>
>>>     
>>>> I don't know if it means anything, but I am also getting a lot of 

>>>> messages like the one below:
>>>>
>>>> 2006- 11- 05 12:07:48 ERROR zen.zenperfsnmp: Device 3406- 1900C- 1
is  
>>>> reporting more than once
>>>> 2006- 11- 05 12:07:48 ERROR zen.zenperfsnmp: Device 1708- 3548XL-
1 is  
>>>> reporting more than once
>>>> 2006- 11- 05 12:07:49 ERROR zen.zenperfsnmp: Device 2478- 3548XL-
1 is  
>>>> reporting more than once
>>>> 2006- 11- 05 12:07:50 ERROR zen.zenperfsnmp: Device  
>>>> Enterprise- 3548XL- 1 is reporting more than once
>>>> 2006- 11- 05 12:07:50 ERROR zen.zenperfsnmp: Device 1407- 3548XL-
1 is  
>>>> reporting more than once
>>>> 2006- 11- 05 12:07:51 ERROR zen.zenperfsnmp: Device 1717A- 3548XL-
1 is  
>>>> reporting more than once
>>>> 2006- 11- 05 12:07:52 ERROR zen.zenperfsnmp: Device 4116- 3548XL-
1 is  
>>>> reporting more than once
>>>> 2006- 11- 05 12:07:53 ERROR zen.zenperfsnmp: Device 3116- 3548XL-
1 is  
>>>> reporting more than once
>>>>
>>>> I have tried a number of things over the weekend, but none seem to
 
>>>> change the problem I am seeing.  Any suggestions would be  
>>>> appreciated, I am stumped at the moment.
>>>>       
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zenoss- users mailing list
> zenoss- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss- users

_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users

Reply via email to