ftanner wrote: > My biggest beef with Zenoss, with regards to Cisco ASA firewalls, is that the > device OIDs that it chooses are either incomplete or erroneous. > > It doesn't give the proper CPU utilization.
I just added our ASA (running ASA version 7.2) to zenoss 7.1.2. I had the issue reported in the top of this thread, but applying the patch fixed the problem and the ASA is now imported correctly. The rest of this post is a little off-topic, but I added my ASA to class "Network/Router/Firewall". There is no CPU graph for the template attached to this device class. Anyway, I checked the Cisco web site where it states to use MIB's CISCO-PROCESS-MIB-V1SMI.my: Article (might need a Cisco login) : http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094a13.shtml Specific OID (ASA OS 6.2.x and later) : ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/oid/CISCO-PROCESS-MIB.oid So I added a graph using the five minute average OID cpmCPUTotal5min ("1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.5") This works a treat. (Actually, the same OID works for all the routers I've tested as well. The revers isn't true - Zenoss uses .private.enterprises.cisco.local.lcpu.avgBusy5 for the routers it seems, as you say, this doesn't work on an ASA) -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=16886#16886 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
