This is the exact reason why I really would like to see some better logging in the zenoss log folder for performance data :)
Seth, I'm running 2.2.0, fresh install from rpm on a centos 5 server. I ran the exact same queries on several of my servers, and below is the output from the slowest result... real 0m0.334s user 0m0.003s sys 0m0.006s I know issues like this are a bit frustrating at times. I've been there!! I can definitely state that the Windows monitoring is much improved in 2.2, but it still leaves just a little to be desired. I think the Zen Devs are really close on the Windows stuff!! Thanks, Russ -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=22108#22108 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
