I generally recommend the full version - the Appliance(if you mean the VMware image they provide) seems to be setup such that it's really only got enough room / RAM allocation etc for a small demo.
Plus, if you fully understand your Linux environment, you'll be better able to extend it yourself. -- James Pulver Information Technology Area Supervisor LEPP Computer Group Cornell University markc99 wrote, On 2/24/2009 1:39 PM: > Greetings all, > > I'm a system administrator for a large hospital in the Central PA area. We > have an infrastructure with around 170 servers, including a VMware ESX > infrastructure. I would say when it's all said it done, we will probably be > monitoring 200-500 items. > > I've been able to get the appliance version up and running rather quickly. > I'm currently having problems installing some ZenPacks, but some of them seem > very interesting because we use HP ProLiant Servers, Barracudas, VMWare ESX, > and APC UPS's among other things. > > Also, I'm slightly concerned that I will get the product setup just right and > then when the data really starts getting stored, we'll outgrow the VM > appliance version. > > I would love you input. > > Thanks, > Mark > > > > > -------------------- m2f -------------------- > > Read this topic online here: > http://forums.zenoss.com/viewtopic.php?p=31640#31640 > > -------------------- m2f -------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > zenoss-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
