On 2 February 2010 22:07, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't particulary like this approach since it depends on the node-name > resolving to something sane and a lot of people have this set up wrong. > > What we've decided to do in the mean time is to force OpenPGM to AF_INET in > OMQ and we can then revisit this discussion later when have someone who > actually needs proper IPv6 support. > > That only applies for "pgm://eth0:7500", I would presume specifying the multicast group would be the more popular method and that forces the family of the interface, i.e. "pgm://eth0;239.192.0.1:7500" or "pgm://eth0;[ff08::1]:7500".
-- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
