Nicholas Piël wrote: > On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: > >>>> // Getting events. >>>> int zmq_poller_event (void *poller, zmq_poll_item_t *item, int *events, >>>> void **hint); >>> So, "Getting events" is the part that actually performs the poll operation? >>> Or is that missing here? >> Yes. The point here is to return the events one by one. If there are no >> events to return, it will wait for one. If there is at least one event, >> one of the will be chosen to be returned. > > I think we need an option to specify a maximum timeout as well, it would > otherwise be difficult to integrate it in an event loop.
Oops! Forgot about it. Your are right. >>>> Maybe zmq_pollset would be more appropriate than zmq_poller? >>> I vote for zmq_pollset, definitely. >> I like 'pollset' better myself. > > +1 Looks like there's almost a concensus on pollset being better than poller. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
