I like PAIR better as it avoids the politically/legally charged "p2p" connotations.
Cheers, Brian On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Martin Sustrik <sust...@250bpm.com> wrote: > Chuck Remes wrote: > >>> Given that the ZMQ_P2P socket is for communication between a PAIR of peers, >>> the name ZMQ_PAIR is more accurate, and also in line with e.g. POSIX calls >>> such as socketpair(). >>> >>> Comments? >> >> I think this new name better describes the intent. I like it. > > Current P2P socket is still an experimental unfinished feature > (reconnect is missing etc.) thus changing the name should not be too > much of annoyance to the users. If people vote in favour of PAIR, let's > change it. > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > -- Brian E. Granger, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Physics Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo bgran...@calpoly.edu elliso...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
