On 21 April 2010 11:52, Bhavin Turakhia <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi
>
>
>
> I have been thinking about some basic pubsub modeling on top of ZeroMQ. The
> one area which requires some thoughts is permissioning. In a typical pubsub
> environment there is a list of subscribers maintained for a node. Only those
> subscribers are permitted to connect and subscribe to the node
>
>
> ZeroMQ obviously does not have this capability and thus it would need to be
> layered above. I can think of the following models for the same –
>
>
>
> * Proxy: The subscriber client establishes a socket connection to zero
> through a proxy of sorts which checks whether the subscriber has the rights
> to connect to this node and if not returns an error and does not let the
> connection through
>
>
>
> * Topic change: Keep changing the name of the topic in question to a random
> guid. The subscriber must talk to an independent system first to fetch the
> current name of this topic. The api that permits this is the one that checks
> permissions of that subscriber. Once the subscriber has the topic name then
> it can directly connect to the queue. Incase the permissions on the node
> change, the topic name is changed again and all current subscribers are
> disconnected forcing them to reconnect
>
>
>
> Has anyone else thought of any other models?
>

If it's a closed system permissions usually should be on the edge, so
ideally sitting on the client if you are using multicast.  On an open system
you will need a locked down broker gateway.

Note you might want to consider adding auditing & accounting into any
permissions system, whenever someone subscribes you should send a messages
all the way up through the model.

Some cases you may also need to proxy clients, such as a webserver with
multiple users connecting to an application server through 0MQ.

-- 
Steve-o
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to