Varol Okan wrote: > Is there a plan to add some type of timeout to at least the recv() call > ? From where I stand that would make sense. Otherwise I would have to > either come up with a timeout mechanism myself or implement a keepalive > message between client/server ( though I never liked keepalive's ).
Yep. This should be done. At the moment it can be done by polling on a socket. zmq_poll has timeout parameter. HTH Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
