Martin Lucina wrote: > Therefore, I must ask the following questions: > > Regarding the actual change of the canonical repository, will existing > collaborators be retained? > > Who will be maintaining this new "fork", if it is a fork, and is this > regarded as a community project or as an iMatix project? > > What will happen to the sustrik/zeromq2 repository, which as of today has > 129 watchers and thus is regarded by at least 129 people as the canonical > repository for 0MQ? > > How will those 129 watchers, and other people not necessarily watching the > mailing list for an obscure message titled "Stable release", learn about > this change? > > Why was this change not implemented simply as the announcement of the > creation of a v2.0-stable branch in the current repository? (This is what I > would have recommended, but no one asked/gave me a chance to answer) > > What is the roadmap for the stabilization of the 2.0.x release?
Good questions! Most of them are up to Pieter to answer. As for sustrik/zeromq2 repo, it's my sandbox, and I intend to use it for further progress towards integration with BSD socket API. The consequence is that the API is not guaranteed to be stable. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
