One more option: Stopwatch implementation would be in libzmq, however, prototypes would be in a separate header file (e.g. zmq_stopwatch.h).
Comments? Martin Pieter Hintjens wrote: > A separate library for this seems overkill and complexity for > no.benefit. You need to be clear about what problem you're solving. Is > one lib a problem? However I'd maybe put portability stuff into > zmq_port, there is some demand for space for functions like uuid. > > -Pieter > > Sent from my Android mobile phone. > >> On Jun 10, 2010 9:49 PM, "Martin Sustrik" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Looks like everyone wants the stopwatch back :) >> >> Is there a rationale for not putting it into a separate "stopwatch" >> library? >> >> Martin >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected]... >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
