[email protected] said: > On 07/27/2010 03:30 AM, Matt Weinstein wrote: > > I've been using ZMQ_STREAM_SOURCE and ZMQ_STREAM_SINK. > > > Not bad actually. > > Other socket names describe the role that user plays with respect to the > particular socket: I'm a PUBlisher. I'm a SUBscriber. I'm a REQuester > (don't confuse that with "sender of REQuests" -- REQuester both sends > requests and receives replies). I'm a REPlier. > > "I'm a message SOURCE" and "I'm a message SINK" kind of fits in. > > Alternative would be PRODUCER and CONSUMER but these are semantically > pretty overloaded.
+1 for ZMQ_SOURCE and ZMQ_SINK. If we were to add these then the question is whether to treat both the old and new as equivalent or just pick one and keep the other as a (undocumented) alias. -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
