On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Matt Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> An alternative to the setsockopt proposal: another RECV flag ZMQ_RECVERR > that forces error returns vs. asserts. Asserts and errors are semantically different, and IMO if you mix the two like that you create fuzzy boundaries between faults that must not be allowed in living code, and faults that are allowed. In biological terms that would be called "cancer" though I'm not sure the analogy works fully. - Pieter Hintjens iMatix - www.imatix.com _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
