[email protected] said: > On 09/03/2010 12:51 PM, Martin Lucina wrote: > > > How would that get you better performance? You'd still have to deal with > > the case where ZMQ_FD would become ready and ZMQ_EVENTS would return > > nothing due to an internal 0MQ event being triggered. > > I don't care. The problem is offloaded to the users. Let them be smart. > I'm an idiot (see the preceding email) :)
You're not an idiot. Nobody's perfect. I'd still rather get "Martin Sustrik level of imperfection" APIs than most of what's out there ... :-) Cheers, -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
