On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Kelly Brock <ke...@inocode.com> wrote:
> Just a thought, it may be a good idea to specifically > state that is the case in the documentation. I.e. "If there are no > connections, all messages are simply dropped." Just a little clarification > for the specific case. (I didn't see it described anywhere at least.) Good idea, I've added that to the guide. > I still would like a response to the last item, which I imagine you > didn't read past the obvious misunderstanding so was easily missed. :) Hmm, general rule of email, keep it to a single question at a time :-) I don't see that 0MQ will ever 'hiccup' and drop messages. You don't know the start and you don't know the end of a pubsub stream but once a subscriber starts to get data it's not going to miss anything unless you are using an unreliable transport like PGM or you have set HWM and your queues are overflowing. > So, if I have a subscriber to a pub socket, is there any indication > that I missed a message because for some random reason I lost temporary > connection, got rerouted, the machine decided to think about God for a > couple minutes whatever? Not in normal scenarios but if you are doing very high rate cases where networks can't handle the load and queues overflow, then maybe. - Pieter Hintjens iMatix - www.imatix.com _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev