On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/28/2010 11:17 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
>>
>> Thanks everyone for pointing our my mistake here.  But I then have a
>> secondary question.  Currently it is possible to crash a REP socket by
>> not adhering to the REQ/REP protocol.  Don't we want to make it more
>> difficult to crash a REP server than this?
>
> Definitely. I've introduced the logging mechanism (sys://log) to 2.1 so any
> violation of the protocol can be handled by silently discarding the
> offending message and logging the fact, so that admin can take appropriate
> measures.

Great!

Brian

> Martin
>
>



-- 
Brian E. Granger, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Physics
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
[email protected]
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to