Sven, > that reminds me of my recently reported problem, that poll returns wrong > codes. > I thought, that it's been completely my fault, because I accidentially > called poll() twice on a socket before recv()ing, BUT: > the second call to poll() should still tell me, that data is availably, > which does not happen (at least for SUB). Instead, it behaves like this: > poll(); ==> blocks until msg arrives, then returns, telling "I have > something"
> poll(); ==> immediately returns(correct!), but telling "(11) ressource > not available", which is wrong what's the return code from zmq_poll in the above? -1? If so, can you provide a minimal test case? > recv(); ==> correctly deliveres the arrived message Thanks! Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
