On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Martin Sustrik <sust...@250bpm.com> wrote: > On 11/19/2010 01:08 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote: >> >> Hi Dhammika, >> >> I am trying to make sense from this, but I still don't see how it can >> happen. Can you possibly run the same test with printing "unplugged" in >> zmq_engine_t::unplug and "plugged" in zmq_engine_t::plug? >> >> That way we'll be sure that engine is deallocated while it's plugged in. > > Actually, it can't be that. > > There's: > > zmq_assert (!plugged); > > in zmq_engine destructor. It would blow up if engine is deallocated while > plugged in... > > I have no idea what's going on. >
I think it's unplugged and passed to another thread, and second thread is deleting it. We do have two instances where we delete engines in process_attach(). Dhammika _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
