On 11/27/2010 10:24 PM, Chuck Remes wrote: > This blocking behavior was raised as an issue in #85. > > https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq2/issues#issue/85 > > That ticket hasn't been updated, but the discussion did include references to > SO_LINGER which I see has been implemented (and documented) as the ZMQ_LINGER > socket option. Since the unwanted behavior (packets dropped when zmq_term() > is called) has been solved by the addition of ZMQ_LINGER, can we now consider > the blocking behavior of zmq_term() to be a bug? > No. It's the only way to achieve the "don't drop the packets on exit" behaviour I can imagine. Except for moving 0MQ into kernel space, of course.
Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
