Sure, didn't realize how many docs needed updating with the note. -- Steve-o
On 7 December 2010 16:55, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote: > Steven, > > Sure. Can you send a signed patch? > > See here: http://www.zeromq.org/docs:contributing > > Thanks. > Martin > > > On 12/07/2010 09:24 AM, Steven McCoy wrote: > >> Hi Martin, >> >> Can you add something to the effect of the following message to the >> description on PUB sockets. >> >> diff --git a/doc/zmq_socket.txt b/doc/zmq_socket.txt >> index 2156af2..a898a58 100644 >> --- a/doc/zmq_socket.txt >> +++ b/doc/zmq_socket.txt >> @@ -180,6 +180,9 @@ high water mark for a _subscriber_, then any >> messages that would be sent to the >> _subscriber_ in question shall instead be dropped until the >> exceptional state >> ends. >> >> +The _zmq_send()_ function will always return successful for _publisher_ >> sockets, >> +no back pressure is provided in situations of a congested _subscriber_. >> + >> [horizontal] >> .Summary of ZMQ_PUB characteristics >> Compatible peer sockets:: 'ZMQ_SUB' >> >> -- >> Steve-o >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >
0001-Add-note-to-PUB-sockets-in-regard-to-lack-of-back-pr.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
