On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Martin Sustrik <sust...@250bpm.com> wrote: > Dhammika, > >>>> 1) Using one zmq context, I bind four separate zmq sockets (in java) to >>>> the same ipc port; e.g. "ipc://tmp/test" >>> >>> Hm, you should be able to bind at most one socket to a particular >>> endpoint. Are you sure all the four binds succeed? >>> >> All four binds will succeed, as we unlink() before we call bind(). >> This is a bug and comments here are misleading. > > True. > > What about not unlinking the file at bind? Would the duplicit bind()s > produce errors?
Yes, duplicate binds will return EADDRINUSE. And would the OS recognise when an applicaion fails and > unlock the file so that different application can bind to the endpoint? > No, OS doesn't delete it on app exit. app has to remove it, ie. call zmq socket close(). Dhammika _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
