On 01/04/2011 03:34 PM, Douglas Creager wrote: >> Ok. That would require passing each peer's HWM to the other peer. >> So that both can compute and use sum HWM instead of the original >> local HWM. >> >> In short: >> >> 1. There's ctx_t::register_endpoint function which register inproc >> endpoint with the context. We can store bind()er's HWM there. >> >> 2. When connect()er retrieves the ednpoint, it would get bind()er's >> HWM along with it, it will add the two HWMs and initialise the >> newly created pipe accordingly. > > Oh, I though this would just be for inproc connections. As in, the > total size of all buffers should be SNDHWM + RCVHWM. For TCP, there > are buffers on either side of the network connection, and so you get > this by having one side create a SNDHWM buffer, and the other create > a RCVHWM buffer. It's only in the inproc connection — where there's > only a single buffer — where you'd have to add together the values to > get the correct buffer size.
Agreed. I haven't suggested otherwise btw. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
