How to proceed: break all language bindings on Windows, and do this for ZeroMQ 3.0 or even 2.2. As long as there is a benefit overall... On 7 Jan 2011 18:05, "Martin Sustrik" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alexey, > >> Is there any rationale for using libzmq.dll library name on Windows >> (and not zmq.dll)? According to the list archives, Martin Sustrik >> proposed renaming libzmq to zmq in February, but nothing came out of >> it. >> Some tools really do expect libraries to be named libfoo.so/foo.dll — >> for example, Java Web Start. Deploying a webstart application that >> uses zeromq+jzmq right now is impossible without hacks (adding >> loadLibrary calls for both "libzmq" and "zmq" and hoping that at least >> one of them will work), so it'd be great if that rename did happen. > > It would be nice to rename the lib, but that would mean breaking all the > language bindings on Windows :( > > Any idea how to proceed? > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
