On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Chuck Remes <[email protected]> wrote:
> For the first time I did some experiments with the inproc transport. My > experiences lead me to suggest that we should rename inproc (for "inprocess" > or inter-thread) to "incontext". Yes, inproc:// is unclear. If you take the long view, it should be 'kernel'. Contexts will eventually disappear, as 0MQ becomes an OS module. Maybe rename the context object to 'kernel' in 3.0 so that it's even more explicit. Otherwise, itc://, inter-thread communications, ignoring the need for these threads to share the same context. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
