Many thanks to Martin - the issue seems to be solved by his patch. Sorry for asking (perhaps it is already discussed), but is the patch expected in 2.0 or I have to switch to 2.1?
Both 2.0 and 2.1 are "stable releases" according to http://www.zeromq.org/intro:get-the-software, but is 2.0 finalized? 02.03.2011, 14:10, "Ilja Golshtein" <[email protected]>: > Pieter, > > here it is https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq2/issues/175 > > I've tried to use inproc to make the example more convenient to use, > but it seems inproc is not affected. > > Via tcp it is straightforward - just write more messages than HWM in XREQ > socket > assuming counterpart is lazy enough. > > Thanks. > > 02.03.2011, 13:49, "Pieter Hintjens" <[email protected]>;: > >> 2011/3/2 Ilja Golshtein <[email protected]>;;: >>> the issue is easily reproducible against 2.1.1. >>> I put example server code here http://pastebin.com/iKYzeJmz (sorry, it is >>> untidy). >>> Actually any attempt to reach HWM via XREP causes application crash. >>> Should I log a ticket? >> Yes, please. >> >> -Pieter >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > -- > Best regards, > Ilja Golshtein. > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev -- Best regards, Ilja Golshtein. _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
