On 11 June 2011 13:59, Martin Sustrik <sust...@250bpm.com> wrote:

> On 06/11/2011 11:23 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> > For the CZMQ zloop reactor, at least, we're only rebuilding the pollset
> > when there's a change. So that'd work nicely with epoll et al.
>
> Ok. I should have not mentioned the second caveat. The real point is
> that epoll is meant to reduce complexity of polling from O(n) -- where n
> is the size of pollset -- to O(1). If we use epoll to implement
> zmq_poll(), we get complexity of O(n log n) which is actually worse than
> O(n) that you get using poll or select.
>

at least this means the czmq can be easily adapted to an eventual new
zmq_epoll api.

Cheers,
Marko
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to