Thanks for the response. I just hoped the broker could look into or poll the timeout-ed dead letters at a further milestone.
Thanks Min 2011/6/30 Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Martin Sustrik <sust...@250bpm.com> > wrote: > > > This is called "dead letter queue" in MQ-speak. > > However, it probably doesn't have the semantics you expect it to have. > > > > It's not a queue of lost messages, rather it's a queue of messages with > > unclear status. They may have been lost, but they may have been > > delivered (only the delivery acknowledgement was lost). > > In any case, ROUTER will queue and hold messages to peers that have > gone offline, and the only way to dead-letter these would be with a > timeout on connection (at which stage any undelivered messages could > be dead-lettered). > > As for invalid addresses, since this is an application error by > definition, I'd argue it's worth making this assert. (Especially if we > kill explicit identities and thus any scenario where ROUTER discarding > a message makes sense). > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
