>From my perspective, the bottom line is: "Just decide what you guys want to do and stick to it" Because that will be easier to explain in my docs for my users.
So in that sense, while I don't care which way or the other engineering-wise, if you've already released 3.x with IDENTITY (whoops), I'd rather wait till 4.0 to see the deprecation/removal --d 2011/7/18 Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com>: > Hi all, > > A question to the list about release policies[1] and the 3.x development. > > Background: we are removing ZMQ_IDENTITY from the product, it's a > necessary step to continuing to improve the product. (Incidentally, if > you are using ZMQ_IDENTITY, let us know your use case). > > The current release policies require that we start a 4.0 branch to > make this change, since it would break compatibility with 3.0 > applications. > > Does people (and especially binding authors) prefer: > > (a) starting a 4.0 version for this work (which means that 3.x will > stop when 3.0.x is mature) > (b) doing this work in 3.1, and changing the release policies to allow this. > > Thanks > Pieter > > [1] http://www.zeromq.org/docs:policies > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
