Thanks Martin. I'm currently developing a networked filesystem, and I'm using zmq as my transport layer for both in-process concurrency management and external peer-to-peer communication. The peer-to-peer communication includes both freeform peer-to-peer communication and structured large-scale subscriptions/publishing (which is one reason I wanted to use zmq3).
I'm not yet to the point where I have started writing zmq-dependent code; in your opinion, is zmq4 stable enough to begin developing applications on top of it? I am not afraid of developing on the bleeding edge, and my project has an estimated arrival date of over 9 months, so there is not a huge amount of pressure for a rock-solid platform yet. -E On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Martin Sustrik <sust...@250bpm.com> wrote: > Hi Elliot, > > > I'm trying to compile zmq3.0 on my machine, and I noticed that when I >> ./configure the latest from the git repo on github, configure still >> checks for libuuid. One of the reasons I wanted to upgrade to zmq3.0 >> was to be able to use the 32-bit peer IDs as opposed to the UUIDs in >> previous versions; is this a feature that hasn't been implemented yet, >> or am I grabbing the wrong code? >> > > Unfortunately, UUIDs are needed for the ZMQ_IDENTITY functionality which is > still present in 3.0. > > However, it was removed in the current development trunk (4.0 to be) and > thus there's no dependency on libuuid: > > https://github.com/zeromq/**libzmq <https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq> > > Martin >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
