On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Martin Lucina <m...@kotelna.sk> wrote:
> I haven't been following the ABI changes closely but from what is said in > this thread libzmq 3.x should definitely be using an ABI version of 2.x. As > for libzmq 4.x, that depends on whether you're counting header files as > part of the documented interface. > > When in doubt, I would follow the definition of "correct programs which ran > in the past continue to run in the future". Hence, dropping ZMQ_DEALER in > 4.x implies a new ABI version of 3 since "getting an error return code" > does not mean a correct program will continue to run. Thanks for the enlightenment, Mato. Very useful. I'll let Sustrik decide what ABI number he wants for 0MQ/4.x; for 0MQ/3.x we've changed to using 2:0:0. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
