On 30 October 2011 18:54, Martin Lucina <mar...@lucina.net> wrote: > Steven, > > steven.mc...@miru.hk said: > > Another large integration project. Before I continue running through > new tests > > it is probably a good idea for the code layout and infrastructure to be > updated > > to all work cleanly. > > Random question/suggestion: This seems like a whole lot of integration work > and extra infrastructure just to get some test cases. > > Why not just use the autoconf built-in "make test" functionality (lets > ignore the fact that it's non-Windows for now) and expand and improve the > existing tests in tests/? > > Other than the lack of OO-ness is there anything you actually *cannot* do > with those tests that you would want to do with GoogleTest/GoogleMock? > > It might prove just an example of why not to use it. It looks interesting for the socket modules but pretty useless for much of the rest of the code.
-- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
