Hi Guys, I've been using Travis CI ( http://travis-ci.org/ ) for a Ruby binding that wraps czmq ( https://github.com/methodmissing/rbczmq ) and also bundles both libzmq and czmq as vendor'ed tarballs.
Both frameworks build without any issues https://github.com/methodmissing/rbczmq/blob/master/ext/rbczmq/extconf.rb#L45-57 . Their VMs are Ubuntu based, with various build and notification hooks supported. I can get pull requests up for Travis CI integration against both zeromq and czmq repositories if there's enough votes in favor of using it as a CI environment. A local environment can easily be bootstrapped with the following tool and Chef cookbooks as well : * https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-cookbooks/tree/master/ci_environment * https://github.com/michaelklishin/sous-chef - Lourens On 2012/02/03, at 16:48, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > We don't need to... Jenkins builds daily and failures are rapidly fixed. > > -Pieter > > On Feb 3, 2012 2:42 PM, "Ian Barber" <ian.bar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Martin Lucina <mar...@lucina.net> wrote: > > Huh? How did that happen? > > -mato > > > As part of the work by Daniel Norberg to free received sub messages. Looking > at the rest of the patch it seems OK to me, but I guess it wasn't built as > is. Not sure how we enforce that kind of thing on pull reqs without a heavier > process though. > > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
