On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Brian Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On the other hand, even lacking an object following them, "get" and "set" > and set are "pretty standard" nomenclature. > Obviously, this is bike shedding, but, FWIW, I think 0mq has historically > done pretty well when it comes to the linguistic design of the API. When > looking for how do something, Parts of the 0MQ API are familiar but overall it's not consistent and as a heavy user of the API that has always been annoying. I note that the API was designed by people who _never_ used it. I do agree that get/set (something) makes sense and will try that change now in the pull request (https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/249) -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
