On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Luca Fascione <lu...@wetafx.co.nz> wrote:
> I don't know that it is a good idea to marry 0mq to a threading library > (even if it is a platform foundation like pthreads), as this might make > adoption hard for folks that need to in other threading environments, > such as TBB or openmp, for example. > > After thinking about it, I believe a much more germane place for it > would be in the language binding libs such as czmq. I other words I > think that thread safety is an application level concern. Quite plausible. > Also, if my app is using already libzmq in a thread safe way, why should > I pay for all this locking and unlocking? You don't pay anything, except that the API is a little more complex. The real question is whether the functionality is accurate and profitable. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
