Yes, that's the repo. Note that every change needs to be backed by an issue and a test case.
Apart from the "can we change the ABI version number" question, it seems a good investment in 2.1. So my suggestion is, make an issue, make a test case, then make a pull request (please also update the ABI version number). I'll test it and then merge it to libzmq2-1 master. -Pieter On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Joshua Foster <jhaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking through the code, much of it has already been back ported as part of > issue 231. Are we still using the https://github.com/zeromq/zeromq2-1 > repository for the 2.1.x development? > > Joshua > > On Mar 30, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Joshua Foster <jhaw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Does anyone have any problem if I back port the send/recv time out socket >>> options to 2.1.x? >> >> Sounds like a great idea. >> >> We'll have to modify the ABI version. This may impact bindings. >> >> -Pieter >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
