On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Claudio Carbone <[email protected]> wrote:
> I got it now, it's easy looking at the C++ headers: > the C++ bindings are just a C++ styled wrapper of the underlying C > functions. > So the functionality and concept of C is maintained in a C++ syntax. > May I ask what was the reasoning behind this? The straight C semantics are easiest to map to arbitrary languages. The C++ binding could have built abstractions on top but never accomplished this. Ironically the C binding (CZMQ) is somewhat higher-level than the C++ binding. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
