Can someone provide their source? The JZMQ numbers seem off. Unless there was a performance regression introduced since then. Also what version of libzmq too.
-Trev On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:28 AM, MinRK <benjami...@gmail.com> wrote: > I ran your tests on my Linux machine (amd64 Ubuntu 12.04, 12 GB RAM, i7 > 930), > in case you are interested in more numbers > > (everything from git master) > > jzmq: > It took 2.574 seconds to process 2000000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a > batch > 777000.7770007771 messages/second > > It took 1.856 seconds to process 500000 messages of size 1.0 KiloByte(s) > in a batch > 269396.5517241379 messages/second > > It took 2.673 seconds to process 125000 messages of size 10.0 KiloByte(s) > in a batch > 46763.93565282454 messages/second > > > jeromq: > > It took 1.33 seconds to process 2000000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a > batch > 1503759.3984962406 messages/second > > It took 2.129 seconds to process 500000 messages of size 1.0 KiloByte(s) > in a batch > 234852.04321277596 messages/second > > It took 3.014 seconds to process 125000 messages of size 10.0 KiloByte(s) > in a batch > 41473.12541473126 messages/second > > > PyZMQ (CPython 2.7 + Cython) > > It took 1.382134 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in > a batch > 108527.827258 messages/second > > It took 1.627566 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 1.0 > Kilobyte(s) in a batch > 92162.1611658 messages/second > > It took 2.618599 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10.0 > Kilobyte(s) in a batch > 57282.539251 messages/second > > > PyZMQ (PyPy 2.0b + CFFI) > > It took 1.614755 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in > a batch > 92893.3491458 messages/second > > It took 1.674885 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 1.0 > Kilobyte(s) in a batch > 89558.3875908 messages/second > > It took 4.030202 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10.0 > Kilobyte(s) in a batch > 37218.9781058 messages/second > > Making a few runs, most of these numbers fluctuate by about 10-20% > > (I couldn't run labview) > > -Min RK > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:08 PM, crocket <crockabisc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Anyhow, jzmq is somewhat slower than JeroMQ when processing small >> messages. >> The slowness that accompnies 10K messages was partly due to using swap >> space on HDD. >> >> >> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:38 PM, crocket <crockabisc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> There is a DEALER that sends messages and receives identical messages in >>> a batch. >>> >>> There is the ROUTER that just sends back what it receives to the sender. >>> >>> I tested JeroMQ, labview-zmq, jzmq, and PyZMQ. >>> >>> The test source code is at >>> https://github.com/crocket/ZeroMQThroughputTest >>> >>> To summarize the test results on a windows xp sp3 32bit system with 3GB >>> RAM, >>> for messages of 10 bytes, JeroMQ >> jzmq >>> PyZMQ >>> labview-zmq >>> for messages of 1 kilobytes, JeroMQ = jzmq = PyZMQ >>> labview-zmq >>> for messages of 10 kilobytes, JeroMQ = jzmq = PyZMQ = labview-zmq >>> >>> Below are the test results. >>> >>> Why is labview-zmq so slow when sending small messages? >>> It's just a wrapper around libzmq like jzmq and PyZMQ. >>> >>> 1) JeroMQ >>> >>> It took 1.59 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a >>> batch >>> 376411.54 messages/second >>> >>> It took 35.81 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 1.0 KiloByte(s) >>> in a batch >>> 16754.16 messages/second >>> >>> It took 304.89 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 10.0 >>> KiloByte(s) in a batch >>> 1967.92 messages/second >>> >>> 2) jzmq >>> >>> It took 4.63 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 10 Byte(s) in a >>> batch >>> 129729.73 messages/second >>> >>> It took 34.30 seconds to process 600000 messages of size 1.0 KiloByte(s) >>> in a batch >>> 17494.75 messages/second >>> >>> It took 48.36 seconds to process 100000 messages of size 10.0 >>> KiloByte(s) in a batch >>> 2067.82 messages/second >>> (If I try to send 600,000 messages of 10 kilobytes in a batch, it says >>> "not enough space".) >>> >>> 3) PyZMQ >>> >>> It took 6.51 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10Byte(s) in a >>> batch >>> 23021.58 messages/second >>> >>> It took 8.78 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 1.0Kilobyte(s) >>> in a batch >>> 17081.85 messages/second >>> >>> It took 73.78 seconds to process 150000 messages of size 10.0Kilobyte(s) >>> in a batch >>> 2033.03 messages/second >>> >>> 4) labview-zmq >>> >>> It took 11.79 seconds to process 40000 messages of size 10Byte(s) in a >>> batch >>> 3390.73 messages/second >>> >>> It took 13.70 seconds to process 40000 messages of size 1.0Kilobyte(s) >>> in a batch >>> 2919.04 messages/second >>> >>> It took 20.67 seconds to process 40000 messages of size 10.0Kilobyte(s) >>> in a batch >>> 1935 messages/second >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
