I wouldn't actually recommend using the green poller, it seems to miss the point. I would use a plain greenlet for each socket if possible.
-MinRK On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:04, Brian Knox <brian.k...@neomailbox.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > (sorry about the new thread - was working on moving my email to a > different provider in the middle of this) > > Min - I merged the poll request on my little laptop and gave it a spin. > Before your pull request: > > > mps: 28066 > mps: 28116 > mps: 29745 > mps: 28912 > mps: 28679 > > after your pull request: > > mps: 78138 > mps: 78364 > mps: 78411 > mps: 78065 > mps: 78175 > > Excellent. > > By the way, just for fun I imported zmq.green instead of zmq without > changing anything else > > mps: 24738 > mps: 24779 > mps: 24759 > mps: 24630 > mps: 24702 > > And it's performance is well below straight zmq Poller. > > > Thanks for the quick patch! > > Brian > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRybGWAAoJEAIP2j2QzUp7TqYH/3RFEE697uGGgWNSQhC1z+ik > oOC3FQnnt1c/y5QUYZOIRyFl4LBZF0PL4u0Awy8Yxaqk7jJeM5wRkpa9cXsMC2xq > yr9JhA3RGOhKsyExd9RGuaZzNKB4G5N+NTGYpDTHNSXTkFysBUWoxNsJYOs7HeC+ > GMblX+6FDzGbg8jYIULTIg8BPbLRen2n3wtROclpzVKrjoN0k91Duvon4VrJb1fp > nZPGYqrEFlm/a3aTks/Mhh3wSq8yqt7AHD1qC7JqC4Yb262GjI0XCl1BAvzBcKCx > Dj/9VpKYnesWbmrx/RPnxkkSdOgqJ7zIbhAGOFAEWyRI55WZGMkKUVQqWRfebRQ= > =IOv1 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
