> I had a simple patch to fix the socket.recvByteBuffer() causing the
> ByteBuffer.setPosition(x) to exceed its own size, but I'm now verifying that
> the whole ByteBuffer part of the code is quite broken, as it does not follow
> the "not receiving(sending) bytes directly from the buffer
Is this patch available some place public? Also what do you mean by
"not receiving(sending) bytes directly from the buffer"?
> - stops working silently if I pass some GC'ed direct buffers, and albeit the
> documentation
> mentions the ZeroCopy with direct buffers, the other one doesn't mention
> anything and should work with non direct buffers, like the byte[] does.
This seems like a bug in documentation and code.
> Who is responsible for the jzmq code and how can I try to help with it?
The JZMQ issue tracker is here:
https://github.com/zeromq/jzmq/issues?state=open
If you want to chat offline, my email is [email protected]
-Trev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
