OS X and Linux uses the same compilers: GCC and Clang, but different linkers.
On 24 January 2014 15:08, Lindley French <lindl...@gmail.com> wrote: > In fact, OSX seems to require a much different build. -soname doesn't seem > to be supported, -f isn't a valid flag to ar, etc. > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Lindley French <lindl...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Update: I don't know why it seemed to be working before, but I've >> confirmed that OSX and linux handle variadic templates the same way. The >> key is there can't be any conversion if you want the non-template overload >> to be called. Therefore I'm solving the problem by adding reinterpret_casts >> to the operator<<s. >> >> In the process of investigating this, I've discovered that OSX does not >> support the -rdynamic gcc option (or the equivalent -Wl,-export-dynamic). >> The zmqpp Makefile will need to be updated to avoid passing this option on >> OSX. >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Lindley French <lindl...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> What is the defined indentation style for zmqpp? I see a lot of it uses >>> tabs, but a few places it uses four spaces. I want to make sure things stay >>> consistent. My editor is configured for 4 space indents; I prefer that >>> since it tends to give a more uniform look across editors. >>> >>> Also, my variadic template pull request was tested on linux, but now >>> what I try to build on OSX I'm getting compile errors. I think it's because >>> the variadic add() function is being preferred to the (void*,int) overload >>> used by the insertion operators for some reason. I'm not sure why this >>> would be different between platforms. >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
