Can you make a minimal case that reproduces the problem?
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Diego Fons <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have 6 DEALER processes, each of which connects to 1 ROUTER process. The > DEALER processes send messages to the ROUTER process, which doesn't reply > through the ROUTER socket. At a given time, one of the DEALER processes > stops working, the other ones are not affected. > > I'm able to see that the blocking process is waiting in > zmq::mailbox_t::recv(). > > HWM is left as default in all sockets. > > How is this situation possible if the ROUTER socket works in fair queue? > > Regards. > > -- > Diego Andrés Fons > Intraway Corp. > Solution Developer > AR Office: +54 (11) 6040 4000 > US Office: +1 (516) 620 3890 > Email: [email protected] > > Visit our website at http://www.intraway.com > Proud to be an ISO 9001:2008 certified company > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
