We tend not to develop against a road map -- we pose problems then solve them. This avoids creating features that no one uses. In the case of raw sockets, this is already in libzmq and shouldn't be that difficult to port into JeroMQ. I would create an issue in GitHub. Even better would be if you submitted a pull request with the fix.
-Trev On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Benjamin <benjamin.l.cor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Trevor, > > thanks for your work on JeroMQ. Are raw sockets on the road map? I would > like to use JeroMQ as a backend for web-requests like Mongrel. > > Regards, > Benjamin > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Bernard <trevor.bern...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi Robin, >> >> I think a previous build might have been overwritten. See: >> >> - https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq3-x/tree/v0.3.3 >> - https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq/tree/v0.3.3 >> >> I would run a diff between to two to see if there are any significant >> differences. I would use the latest stable build which is v0.3.4. >> >> Regards, >> >> Trevor >> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Robin Newton >> <robin.new...@linguamatics.com> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm using JeroMQ 0.3.3 in a product, and I've just noticed that there's >> > a >> > difference between the jar I've been using up until now, and the one >> > that's >> > currently downloadable (from >> > >> > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/releases/org/zeromq/jeromq/0.3.3/). >> > >> > Many of the class files are different, but that could mean anything, and >> > I'm >> > not about to start poking around that in detail. However, there are >> > other >> > differences suggesting the builds were done with different source: the >> > org.jeromq package was present in the older jar, but not the most >> > recent; >> > the class org.zeromq.ZMQ$Event is new. Moreover, the SCM details >> > recorded in >> > their respective pom.xml files are different. (See attached diff.) >> > >> > Does anyone have any idea what the significance of this is? >> > >> > My guess is that I should just use the more recent jar, and that >> > provided I >> > wasn't depending on classes from org.jeromq (which I wasn't) then it >> > should >> > all be fine. I'm mainly asking because I don't like mysteries. (That >> > said, >> > the thought that the content of release builds might change is a bit >> > unsettling.) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Robin >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
