Hello, I am not familiar with JeroMQ and not too much with Java, so take my inputs carefully :P.
> but I accidently released v0.3.4 with Java 1.7 and it's proved not to be a > problem. This is a good sign. What are the advantages of supporting >= 1.7 only (and thus dropping support for 1.6) ? Are there benefits for the JeroMQ devs/maintainer? I want to say, if its free to support 1.6 then we should support it. However, if takes time to maintain it then I don't know. On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Trevor Bernard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I propose we bump the minimum supported Java version to 1.7 since Java > 6 is already end of life. Originally I was leary of doing this because > I believed it would break peoples code but I accidently released > v0.3.4 with Java 1.7 and it's proved not to be a problem. > > Thoughts? > > -Trevor > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev -- Kapp Arnaud - Xaqq _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
