I thought that the tidbits that were being received on the end of the broker at the front end and backend (I'm talking about how in the guide it refers to some of what is received as address and empty) were required because of something to do with ZMQ internals-as though the address received, and then sent with SNDMORE was being used to help route it, and because it was a router socket, you would *have* to receive that part.
But this is strange, because on the other end, there is just a send and recv; it's really simple. Do you mean to say that the address message received on one end *doesn't* have to do with ZMQ internals as I assumed, and that the backend and frontend routing logic can be duplicated on each end, so long as frontend requests and frontend handlers are pairwise consistent (and likewise to backend)? On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > You can change anything you like. Be clear about the semantics > however. The load balancing broker is sending requests for action to > workers. It's not a symmetric flow. > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller > <kennethadammil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can the mechanism of load balancing broker be changed so that exactly the > > same send/recv pattern is followed regardless of which side connects? > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > >> > >> In the lbbroker example all traffic flows through the broker. > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller > >> <kennethadammil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Does the broker demonstrated in the manual under: > >> > > >> > http://zguide.zeromq.org/page:all#A-Load-Balancing-Message-Broker > >> > > >> > demonstrate that > >> > > >> > A) when each end makes a connection request, after they link up from > the > >> > broker, their messages route directly between one another > >> > > >> > In this scenario, the messages sent by each side on request will hit > the > >> > broker, but the replies they send will go directly to one another. > >> > > >> > or > >> > > >> > B) that at all times, information is routing via the broker? > >> > > >> > In this scenario, the requests have to first go to the broker, and > then > >> > the > >> > replies also hit the broker, which it ferries across to each side. > >> > > >> > Which is the case? > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > zeromq-dev mailing list > >> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> zeromq-dev mailing list > >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
