We don't insist on this; each project is free to define its own license. E.g. pyzmq has a dual LGPL+BSD license.
libzmq, JeroMQ, NetMQ have the original LGPLv3+SLE license. CZMQ, Zyre have the MPLv2. -Pieter On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Wynne Adam (CR/RTC3.1-NA) <[email protected]> wrote: > Do all ZMQ libraries that have not migrated to MPLv2 have this "static link > exception? > > Thanks > Adam > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pieter Hintjens > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 1:15 AM > To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ License > > libzmq is distributed under LGPLv3 with a static link exception. > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Peter Ritter <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hello >> >> I got a quick question about the ZeroMQ license. I was under the >> impression that ZeroMQ is distributed under the LGPL license (GNU >> Lesser General Public License). However, I just used the Windows >> installer (64Bit) and it pretty much looked like I had to agree to the >> GPL (GNU General Public License). I ran the installer twice just to be sure. >> I didn't see anything about LGPL. >> Maybe I'm imagining things, but I thought I'd ask nonetheless. >> Thanks in advance. >> Peter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
