Huh? I see examples/security/*.c, still using zauth_new (zauth_v2.c) and zsocket_new instead of zactor_new and zsock_new, but the tests in zauth give a good idea of what to do.
Thanks, I should have checked the obvious! On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, it's out of date, sorry. There are up to date examples in CZMQ > examples/security. > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Brian T. Carcich > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > It looks to me like the > > > > Using ZeroMQ Security (part 2) > > > > blog entry i.e. > > > > http://hintjens.com/blog:49 > > > > is out of date, as it uses the declared obsolete > > > > zauth_new(ctx); > > > > call from zauth_v2.c to instantiate a new zauth structure, and The New > Way > > is something like > > > > zactor_new(zauth,NULL); > > > > Is that correct? > > > > I am coming at this trying to get something done on a deadline, so > > understanding everything is not my first priority. Not that failure to > plan > > on my part constitutes an emergency on anyone else's, nor am I asking > anyone > > to do my homework, but if the answer is a simple yes then I'd appreciate > > knowing it so I can take the correct fork in the road the first time. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brian Carcich > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
