Ah, I missed your patches. Merged it now. The release process for tarballs is documented here as it has for a while: http://zeromq.org/docs:distributions
For testing on Windows, I believe there's an appveyor CI running. Though probably not testing the tweetnacl integration. On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:10 AM, MinRK <benjami...@gmail.com> wrote: > I added it to Makefile.am upstream, and opened a PR backporting that and the > Windows support to 4.1. But I wasn't able to verify that it actually fixes > the problem, since the release process appears to be undocumented. > > -MinRK > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: >> >> Not packaging tweetnacl was an oversight; someone added it to the >> project and did not update Makefile.am. I will make this change. I >> think it should also go into src/foreign rather than into the root >> directory. >> >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:52 AM, MinRK <benjami...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I noticed that tweetnacl isn't included in the releases. Is this >> > intentional? >> > >> > How are the tarballs made? I started trying to fix this, but didn't find >> > any >> > documentation for how zeromq is released, and `make dist` seems to fail >> > due >> > to missing Makefile sources in `build/cmake`. >> > >> > -MinRK >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Sergei Nikulov >> > <sergey.niku...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> 2016-01-13 13:34 GMT+03:00 James Chapman <ja...@linux-101.org>: >> >> > Hi Pieter >> >> > >> >> > I've just tried to build 4.1.4 on Windows using VS2015. The build >> >> > fails with the following compilation error: >> >> > >> >> > tcp_address.cpp(440): error C3861: 'if_nametoindex': identifier not >> >> > found >> >> > >> >> > I should also add that the VS projects on 4.1 branch do not build >> >> > without a lot of tweaking. I've taken to ignoring the packaged >> >> > solution files and just using my own. >> >> > >> >> > James >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> It seems that it was already been fixed on master 4.1 branch. >> >> And it was bumped support from XP to Vista in upcoming 4.1.5 because >> >> of this change 849e5b07d982e7c0917a13d9ff22d447817dd7fe (support for >> >> IPv6 link local addresses). >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Sergei Nikulov >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
