This reminds me - I'm going to experiment with using go build tags for controlling builds of draft contracts in goczmq.
I like the "used by real users" qualification on marking contracts as stable. On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:53 AM Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was writing a summary article on community building and revisited > the C4 RFC. There were many small things that were out of date, > speculative, or did not fit with our current best practice. > > So I've updated it here: https://github.com/zeromq/rfc/pull/83 > > Please *do* read the diffs and let me know your opinions. > > I also would like advice on whether: > > * we make a new RFC (C4.2) > * we accept to change the existing stable RFC unilaterally > > Option 1 is more correct but means we have to update a lot of > projects. Option 2 is lazy and breaks our process. > > -Pieter > > -Pieter > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
