I actually those are different issues. If you suffer from the pubsub
issue, I think I trace the bug and have a solution. Take a look at the
issue. If you suffer from the 100K issue, I think that is a different
one, anyway you can try the solution as well. It might be related to
another pipe.terminate call

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:46 PM, zmqdev <zmq...@amitego.com> wrote:
> On 20.10.2016 14:31, Doron Somech wrote:
>>
>> Also I think it smells like using socket from multiple threads...
>
>
> unfortunately no, the assertion strikes in a single thread application.
>
> See also the test case at
>
>         https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2163
>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Doron Somech <somdo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It don't think it is correct, there might be an issue we need to solve.
>>>
>>> The workaround is not to use multi-part messages...
>>>
>
> I like multi-part messages!
>
> The workaround would require me to do the framing myself, which would be
> tricky, considering the advanced state of the application.
>
>
> Thanks anyway.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to