On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 11:07 -0500, Eric Pederson wrote: > Hi all - > > > There was some discussion on the list last year about tagging the > cppzmq project and potentially moving it back into the libzmq project. > Moving it back is probably a good idea but in the short term is it > possible to tag what is there as v4.2.0? I'm working on updating a > Conan recipe for it and it would be good to have a stable tag to work > from. > > > Thanks, > > -- Eric
Has cppzmq ever been tagged? Given it's a single header, I though the idea was that it just followed the latest version of libzmq, but I could be wrong as I don't use it
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
